Gnarls Barkley - The Odd Couple
March 24th, 2008 | 4:32 pm est |
In a world where it’s the norm to have a one-off collaboration between a producer and a rapper, something special has to happen to prompt a sequel. Of course, “Crazy” was all the prompting needed for Cee-Lo and Danger Mouse to rejuvenate Gnarls Barkley, their collaboration by mail that sparked the brightest and catchiest single since OutKast’s “Hey Ya.”
Fans and critics have to understand that these two were exactly the types to walk away from a follow-up simply for the purpose of a cash-in, which makes that follow-up, The Odd Couple, such a strange proposition — it’s exactly like St. Elsewhere, and fails to reveal a single new thing. All the hallmarks of a follow-up record are here: similar sounds and themes, for sure, but also a clear lack of innovation, lyrical and production touches that have since become clichés, and more than just a few passages that will prompt a severe case of listener déjà vu. (Of course, many listeners may enjoy that sense of déjà vu.) As before, Danger Mouse’s productions are miniature, modernist spaghetti Westerns, very closely detailed whether their major voice is an acoustic guitar or a choir of unholy voices. These are then chained to amped-up beats and beefed-up basslines to create something that sounds both vintage and up-to-date at the same time. Cee-Lo’s lyrics and vocals again reveal a lunatic (or seer), someone who’s occasionally more lucid than those who are sane, an enlightened psychopath wrestling with his demons and revealing the thin line between crazy and sane. At times, The Odd Couple is a more beautiful record than its predecessor — the duo have never put out anything more moving on a musical and emotional level than “Who’s Going to Save My Soul,” and Danger Mouse’s production work outshines St. Elsewhere on one track (”Open Book”). But all too often Cee-Lo relies on the same sort of lyrical cipher as on St. Elsewhere, although none of them are as effective. “I don’t understand how I’m so understanding”; “I’m goin’ on, and I think they’ll have a place for you too”; “I could be a would be killer” — these are the ramblings of a madman; they may sound deep and profound late at night, but they’re revealed as nonsense with the light of day.






wrong. great album. cee-lo’s voice alone is incredible, let alone the unbelievable depth of the production. and the lyrics are brilliant night, day, whenever.
You, critic, you have failed to realize that together Cee-Lo Green the Soul Machine and Danger Mouse are transformers. They optimize into Gnarls Barkley. But let me ask, what’s the best follow up album you’ve ever heard?
I’ll check this out regardless of the lackluster review (AMG panned the shit outta the new Architecture In Helsinki, not entirely unjustifiably, but I still liked it a thousand times more than the reviewer despite those flaws with which I agree) - that said, it’s nice to know one man’s opinion going in. (3, if you count the previous comments despite their brevity. ^_^)
Rones (nonsense spoonerism, super!) raises a fun point, though! I liked Hot Hot Heat 2, Elevator, considerably better than Make Up The Breakdown (discounting the original garage mess, natch)…Thinkin about it, In Case We Die was pretty much an all around better Architecture record than Fingers Crossed… but is it the ‘best follow-up’? I’ll have to think about it and check back. >_
After repeated listens I find this to be a solid record that plays well start to finish, and has some of their strongest material. Gnarls Barkley seem to cement their style with “Odd Couple” and “Who’s gonna Save My Soul” is gnarls doing what they do best. Despite this review give this album the respect it deserves.