http://blog.allmusic.com/2008/02/22/leapling-rossini/ Sun, 20 Jul 2008 13:09:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1 http://blog.allmusic.com/2008/02/22/leapling-rossini/#comment-5090 Paula Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:48:11 +0000 http://blog.allmusic.com/2008/02/22/leapling-rossini/#comment-5090 I love Rossini and I also loved this rich article, many thanks. Paula I love Rossini and I also loved this rich article, many thanks.
Paula

]]> http://blog.allmusic.com/2008/02/22/leapling-rossini/#comment-5189 Susan Prince Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:53:40 +0000 http://blog.allmusic.com/2008/02/22/leapling-rossini/#comment-5189 Thank you for a delicious fun article. The maestro would have delighted in it! Thank you for a delicious fun article. The maestro would have delighted in it!

]]> http://blog.allmusic.com/2008/02/22/leapling-rossini/#comment-5401 estiv Sat, 01 Mar 2008 05:20:22 +0000 http://blog.allmusic.com/2008/02/22/leapling-rossini/#comment-5401 TO be precise, it's Rossini's 52 birthday, since 1800 and 1900 were not leap years. That's how the Gregorian calendar works. A leap year is every fourth year except for years that end in 00, unless that year is divisible by 400. So 2000 was a leap year, and so was 1600, but not 1700, 1800, or 1900. But your article overall? I really enjoyed it. TO be precise, it’s Rossini’s 52 birthday, since 1800 and 1900 were not leap years. That’s how the Gregorian calendar works. A leap year is every fourth year except for years that end in 00, unless that year is divisible by 400. So 2000 was a leap year, and so was 1600, but not 1700, 1800, or 1900.
But your article overall? I really enjoyed it.

]]>